Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

INTER-NOISE 02

Date : Jeudi, Juin 19, 2003
Heure : Tout le jour

2002 August 19-21
INTER-NOISE 02, The 2002 International Congress and Exposition
on Noise Control Engineering,, Dearborn, Michigan, USA. Contact:
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, P.O. Box 3206 Arlington
Branch, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA. Telephone: +1 914
462-4006:FAX: +1 914 462 4006.

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002

Date : Jeudi, Juin 19, 2003
Heure : 12:00du matin CEST (GMT+02:00)

2002 September 16-21
FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002*, the 3rd Convention of the European
Acoustics Association, Sevilla, Spain.* Contact: Sociedad
Espanola de Acustica, Serrano, 144, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Telephone: +34 91 561 88 06, ext. 056; FAX: +34 91 411 76 51.
e-mail: sea@...
http://www.ia.csic.es/sea/index.htm

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002

Date : Jeudi, Juin 19, 2003
Heure : 12:00du matin CEST (GMT+02:00)

2002 September 16-21
FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002*, the 3rd Convention of the European
Acoustics Association, Sevilla, Spain.* Contact: Sociedad
Espanola de Acustica, Serrano, 144, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Telephone: +34 91 561 88 06, ext. 056; FAX: +34 91 411 76 51.
e-mail: sea@...
http://www.ia.csic.es/sea/index.htm

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

INTER-NOISE 02

Date : Jeudi, Juin 19, 2003
Heure : Tout le jour

2002 August 19-21
INTER-NOISE 02, The 2002 International Congress and Exposition
on Noise Control Engineering,, Dearborn, Michigan, USA. Contact:
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, P.O. Box 3206 Arlington
Branch, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA. Telephone: +1 914
462-4006:FAX: +1 914 462 4006.

http://www.infobruit.org/decibel/db.htm - 11ème Edition du Concours du Décibel
d'Or (CNB)

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002

Date : Samedi, Juillet 19, 2003
Heure : 12:00du matin CEST (GMT+02:00)

2002 September 16-21
FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002*, the 3rd Convention of the European
Acoustics Association, Sevilla, Spain.* Contact: Sociedad
Espanola de Acustica, Serrano, 144, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Telephone: +34 91 561 88 06, ext. 056; FAX: +34 91 411 76 51.
e-mail: sea@...
http://www.ia.csic.es/sea/index.htm

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

INTER-NOISE 02

Date : Samedi, Juillet 19, 2003
Heure : Tout le jour

2002 August 19-21
INTER-NOISE 02, The 2002 International Congress and Exposition
on Noise Control Engineering,, Dearborn, Michigan, USA. Contact:
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, P.O. Box 3206 Arlington
Branch, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA. Telephone: +1 914
462-4006:FAX: +1 914 462 4006.

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

INTER-NOISE 02

Date : Samedi, Juillet 19, 2003
Heure : Tout le jour

2002 August 19-21
INTER-NOISE 02, The 2002 International Congress and Exposition
on Noise Control Engineering,, Dearborn, Michigan, USA. Contact:
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, P.O. Box 3206 Arlington
Branch, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA. Telephone: +1 914
462-4006:FAX: +1 914 462 4006.

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002

Date : Samedi, Juillet 19, 2003
Heure : 12:00du matin CEST (GMT+02:00)

2002 September 16-21
FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002*, the 3rd Convention of the European
Acoustics Association, Sevilla, Spain.* Contact: Sociedad
Espanola de Acustica, Serrano, 144, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Telephone: +34 91 561 88 06, ext. 056; FAX: +34 91 411 76 51.
e-mail: sea@...
http://www.ia.csic.es/sea/index.htm

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002

Date : Mardi, Août 19, 2003
Heure : 12:00du matin CEST (GMT+02:00)

2002 September 16-21
FORUM ACUSTICUM 2002*, the 3rd Convention of the European
Acoustics Association, Sevilla, Spain.* Contact: Sociedad
Espanola de Acustica, Serrano, 144, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Telephone: +34 91 561 88 06, ext. 056; FAX: +34 91 411 76 51.
e-mail: sea@...
http://www.ia.csic.es/sea/index.htm

Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

INTER-NOISE 02

Date : Mardi, Août 19, 2003
Heure : Tout le jour

2002 August 19-21
INTER-NOISE 02, The 2002 International Congress and Exposition
on Noise Control Engineering,, Dearborn, Michigan, USA. Contact:
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, P.O. Box 3206 Arlington
Branch, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA. Telephone: +1 914
462-4006:FAX: +1 914 462 4006.

Bonjour,

je suis en congé du 23 juillet au 5 août

vous pouvez joindre le secrétariat de la mission bruit au 01 42 19 15 41

cordialement

>>> traffic-noise 05/08/03 00:02 >>>


Nous avons le plaisir de vous rappeler l'événement suivant.

INTER-NOISE 02

Date : Mardi, Août 19, 2003
Heure : Tout le jour

2002 August 19-21
INTER-NOISE 02, The 2002 International Congress and Exposition
on Noise Control Engineering,, Dearborn, Michigan, USA. Contact:
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, P.O. Box 3206 Arlington
Branch, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603, USA. Telephone: +1 914
462-4006:FAX: +1 914 462 4006.




Post message: traffic-noise@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe:  traffic-noise-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:  traffic-noise-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner:  traffic-noise-owner@yahoogroups.com
URL : http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/traffic-noise

Le monde du silence ...

The world of silence ...

L'utilisation du service Yahoo! Groupes est soumise à l'acceptation des
Conditions d'utilisation et de la Charte sur la vie privée, disponibles
respectivement sur http://fr.docs.yahoo.com/info/utos.html et
http://fr.docs.yahoo.com/info/privacy.html

Bonjour,

La mise en place des 35 heures en France a eu un impact sur la
répartition des trafics à la fois selon les journées mais aussi selon
les tranches horaires. L'une des bases de calcul des niveaux sonores
est la connaissance du trafic moyen journalier annuel.

Une étude a-t-elle été réalisée afin d'évaluer s'il est nécessaire de
mofifier la méthode d'évaluation du TMJA (TMJA = 10 HP ??; comptages
traditionnellement fait les mardi et/ou jeudi ??).

Merci des renseignements que vous pourrez apportez.

C.O.R.E. Quest - Call for Topics: Improving Anti-Noise Activism

Becoming an effective anti-noise activist can be an arduous process.  Gaining
experience by trial and error can be mostly error and quite a trial.  Wouldn't
it be great to go straight to the "core" skills and sharpen those needed for
effective activism?  That's what C.O.R.E. Quest is all about.  Small, tightly
focused groups convened via the internet for 1 to 2 week sessions, sharing
knowledge and insight under the guidance of an experienced mentor.  The goal of
each group is to release a "statement of findings and recommendations" at the
end of each session.  There are no fees,  no minimum qualifications - only the
desire to learn and become more effective.

C.O.R.E. Quest wants to know what YOU want to know:

         - Understanding Noise Measurement?
	 - Understanding Noise Laws?
         - Effective Lobbying and Letter Writing?
         - Working With Local Police?
         - Using the Internet for Research?
	 - ? ? ?

Please respond with your request(s) for topics by Tuesday, September 30, 2003. 
Depending on interest, sessions will be scheduled shortly thereafter, possibly
as early as Monday, October 6th.

-= The C.O.R.E. Quest Concept =-

Concern for Others -+- Responding with Experience
Building "core" skills -+- Serving "core" activists
Passionate people sharing knowledge and experience helping others be more
effective

Dear,

I ash how i can calculate the road segment


Hany

http://hany.hossam.50megs.com

[posted on behalf of Thaddeus McCorland / Quiet Please United /
quietpleaseunited@... ]

Dear Group:

Quiet Please United has received this request for information regarding noise by
an important newspaper with national clout. The journalist in question is
working on an major piece on noise.

His question is a tough one. Any information or guidance would be vastly
appreciated. Here it is verbatim:

"Thanks very much. Are you aware of any studies nationally or locally that
demonstrated that ambient urban noise levels are growing, particularly because
of traffic? I have asked about this quite a bit and have not found any studies.
I am aware that census data and housing studies demonstrate noise is a serious
community concern. But I am trying to find if any states, cities,counties or
other government units have actually measured noise and have done so over the
last five, 10 or 20 years? Thanks."

Bonjour / Hi

Je suis adhérent d'associations de défense de l'environnement et
président de l'ADTC Est Parisien, une association d'usagers des
transports
http://vieachamps.free.fr/viewtopic.php?t=159
je communique de préférence en français, car mon anglais n'est pas
terrible

I'm member of environmental groups, and chairman of a transit
advocacy group
http://vieachamps.free.fr/viewtopic.php?t=159
I prefer to write in french, because my english is not terrific.

Salutations / Regards

Hi,

I belong to an association which fights against the alignment of a 4
ways road, which we believe is detrimental to the environment and
population (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/adse).

There are now two aligments, which we know rather accurately. Both
run in the country side and the impact on the population will
essentialy be determined by the proximity of the houses (dispersed)
and the relief.

I am aware that a precise determination can only be given from a
simulation, taking account all parameters. However, we cannot afford
this and what we need are general guidelines to evaluate the impact.

To simplify, one alignment runs on a nearly flat ground, the other
one on one side of a valley. Is it possible to evaluate the impact on
each house, given its location (we assume there will not be any noise
wall or particular installation against noise impact)?


many thanks,

ornitorink2 a écrit :

>Hi,
>
>I belong to an association which fights against the alignment of a 4
>ways road, which we believe is detrimental to the environment and
>population (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/adse).
>
>There are now two aligments, which we know rather accurately. Both
>run in the country side and the impact on the population will
>essentialy be determined by the proximity of the houses (dispersed)
>and the relief.
>
>I am aware that a precise determination can only be given from a
>simulation, taking account all parameters. However, we cannot afford
>this and what we need are general guidelines to evaluate the impact.
>
>To simplify, one alignment runs on a nearly flat ground, the other
>one on one side of a valley. Is it possible to evaluate the impact on
>each house, given its location (we assume there will not be any noise
>wall or particular installation against noise impact)?
>
>
>many thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Post message: traffic-noise@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe:  traffic-noise-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe:  traffic-noise-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner:  traffic-noise-owner@yahoogroups.com
>URL : http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/traffic-noise
>
>Le monde du silence ...
>
>The world of silence ...
>Liens Yahoo! Groupes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
--------
>Wanadoo vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
>Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>
>
>
>
Bonjour,

Si vous le voulez, je vous donnerai des infos au téléphone

0871 256 400 (prix appel local)

Alain Le Dosseur
Ingénieur Acousticien
ACOUSTIQUE SERIAL

Bonjour,

merci pour cette documentation que j'ai parcourue. Les informations
concernant la situation "en champ libre" me sont utiles.
Malheureusement, elle concerne principalement les conditions urbaines,
et ne renseigne pas sur les problèmes de topographie à grande échelle.


thanks for providing this information. Data concerning open conditions
are usefull. However, the documentation is mainly about urban
conditions, so that is it is of little help to evaluate the influence
of large scale topography.

If you know the level of noise that is expected to be generated by the
traffic at a location near to the new road, say at 25 metres, which often
quoted by the generation part of noise models, it would be possible to work
out the noise level at a distant property by applying a simplified formula
allowing just for the effect of distance and ground cover.

It would be reasonable to ignore the screening effect of the nearer
properties for noise levels at distant properties if the houses are
scattered, but you should understand that noise levels at distances of
several hundred metres can change considerably according to the direction of
wind, as well as being significantly affected by temperature gradients. This
is why the noise models become so complex.

For a very simple calculation on the basis of distance only, in the case of
flat (presumably cultivated) ground, I would apply a reduction of about 4.5
dB per doubling of distance. Across a valley, assuming the sound travels
well above the ground, ignoring the effect of vegetation noise levels would
be reduced by 3 dB per doubling of distance.

However, estimating the noise arriving from the traffic will not necessarily
address the question of question of impact, because the traffic noise
arriving will be compared with the ambient noise level in the vicinity of
the property. It will generally be noticeable if the new noise level is 5 dB
above ambient and would be considered a nuisance if it is 10 dB above
ambient.

I hope this helps.

Peter Kinsey

-----Original Message-----
From: traffic-noise@... [mailto:traffic-noise@...]
On Behalf Of Acoustique SERIAL
Sent: 12 October 2005 14:12
To: traffic-noise@...
Subject: Re: [traffic-noise - Bruit Routier] Need help for rough evaluation
of road impact

ornitorink2 a écrit :

>Hi,
>
>I belong to an association which fights against the alignment of a 4
>ways road, which we believe is detrimental to the environment and
>population (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/adse).
>
>There are now two aligments, which we know rather accurately. Both
>run in the country side and the impact on the population will
>essentialy be determined by the proximity of the houses (dispersed)
>and the relief.
>
>I am aware that a precise determination can only be given from a
>simulation, taking account all parameters. However, we cannot afford
>this and what we need are general guidelines to evaluate the impact.
>
>To simplify, one alignment runs on a nearly flat ground, the other
>one on one side of a valley. Is it possible to evaluate the impact on
>each house, given its location (we assume there will not be any noise
>wall or particular installation against noise impact)?
>
>
>many thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Post message: traffic-noise@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe:  traffic-noise-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe:  traffic-noise-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner:  traffic-noise-owner@yahoogroups.com
>URL : http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/traffic-noise
>
>Le monde du silence ...
>
>The world of silence ...
>Liens Yahoo! Groupes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>Wanadoo vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
>Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>
>
>
>
Bonjour,

Si vous le voulez, je vous donnerai des infos au téléphone

0871 256 400 (prix appel local)

Alain Le Dosseur
Ingénieur Acousticien
ACOUSTIQUE SERIAL





Post message: traffic-noise@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe:  traffic-noise-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:  traffic-noise-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner:  traffic-noise-owner@yahoogroups.com
URL : http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/traffic-noise

Le monde du silence ...

The world of silence ...
Liens Yahoo! Groupes











--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.14/129 - Release Date: 11/10/2005

Hi,


thanks for the tips to evaluate the noise of the future road. I have
evaluated the noise at 100 m, 60 dB. Using the attenuation quoted, I
find that the noise level should be felt as a nuisance up to about 3
kms during night (quiet countryside environment). Is this reasonable,
or is the long distance attenuation dependent on many other factors
which help shortening this distance ?

At that distance there may well be other features such as woodland that
would further attenuate noise. But I think you may be confusing external and
internal noise levels. The typical countryside attenuation over 3 km should
produce about 20 dB reduction, and so you are considering a noise level of
about 40 dB at the receptor to be a nuisance I suppose. However, given that
even an open window will reduce external noise by an additional 20 dB, the
traffic noise would hardly be noticeable indoors, although it would be
dominant in the open air in the absence of any other source.

-----Original Message-----
From: traffic-noise@... [mailto:traffic-noise@...]
On Behalf Of ornitorink2
Sent: 25 October 2005 09:59
To: traffic-noise@...
Subject: [traffic-noise - Bruit Routier] noise evaluation

Hi,


thanks for the tips to evaluate the noise of the future road. I have
evaluated the noise at 100 m, 60 dB. Using the attenuation quoted, I
find that the noise level should be felt as a nuisance up to about 3
kms during night (quiet countryside environment). Is this reasonable,
or is the long distance attenuation dependent on many other factors
which help shortening this distance ?

We hope you can help us in some way on dealing with train horns.
   What is the status of the trains having to follow the way horns
are
blown at crossings compared to the FRA rules
http://www.uprr.com/newsinfo/horn.shtml
  said to start on June 24th 2005?  I live in Hamburg NY
and have been working with local residents and the town of Hamburg
to
try to get the rules enforced by the FRA or CSX/Norfolk Southern
100+
trains that pass threw Hamburg every day since June 24th.  We have
been
told by the FRA the June 24th rules do not have to be followed yet
since the Association of American Railroads
http://www.aar.org/
  has petitioned the rules and  the FRA gave the "AAR" a 120 day
grace period to the AAR follow/learn the rules.
Which brang it to mid October 2005.  After that date the FRA then
said
CSX/Norfolk Southern still do not have to follow the rules till the
rules are  changed to the AAR asking with no ETA when the rules are
to be changed
and what the rules changes are to be.  Yes we have paper work to
prove
this is what we have been told which honestly sounds fishy to us to
say
the least.  Yes we would like quite zones
http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318
  some day..only problem is our town does not have the money to pay
for the multiple crossings in our town that would cost over $100,000
to install.  We have been trying to find some type of funding with
no luck.  FYI asking CSX and Norfolk Southern to follow the rules
only makes issues worse with the trains blowing their horns even
more we have found out when we are able to get some type of reply
from both.., like they are telling us don't try to tell us what we
have to do or how to do it.  We can not find any docoments saying
the rules should not be enforced/followed as of June 24th 2005.

This is a list of websites I have found some info on.

(Check resolution #27,113 on the page below)
http://www.ci.burbank.ca.us/agendas/ag_council/2005

http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/tcap/chapter8.pdf

(Check page #3 below)
http://www.dot.state.ga.us/dot/plan-
prog/intermodal/rail/Documents/PDF/Vol%201,%20No%203%20-%20June-July-
August%202005.pdf

(Check bottom of Page #3 below on $1,575,000 from the FRA for a
quite zone)
http://www.taxpayer.net/budget/fy04omnibus/omnibus/TCSfy04omnibus-
OK.pdf

(Check..OnTrac received the final approval of $3.4 million in
federal funds by federal and state agencies)
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/10/prweb171494.htm

(Check Railroad Quite Zone)
http://www.downtownbillings.com/dbp/dbpcouncil.html

http://www.airchime.bc.ca/railmodelk.asp

http://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/articles/2005/11/14/news/news2.txt

http://www.beverly-blast.org/archives/cat_news.shtml

http://carolynmccarthy.house.gov/index.cfm?
ContentID=448&ParentID=0&SectionID=32&SectionTree=32&lnk=b&ItemID=440

http://www.nwmc-
cog.org/jahia/Jahia/cache/offonce/pid/322;jsessionid=D3C6F90221A7B97D
42A008FBF9F157EE

http://www.dieselairhorns.com/index.html

http://www.shpna.org/old_site/caltrain/FRA49CFR222_229.htm#129

http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/21

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.
gpo.gov/2003/03-30606.htm

http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/officeofsafety/

http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/Trans/hpw106-101.000/hpw106-
101_1.HTM

http://groups.google.com/group/Railfans?lnk=lr

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism.noise.pollution?lnk=lr

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement.traffic?lnk=lr

http://groups.google.com/group/ba.transportation?lnk=lr

http://www.hansonwilson.com/information.asp

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Horn_Whistle/

http://www.progressiverailroading.com/freightnews/article.asp?id=7806

http://www.akrr.com/PROJECTS/documents/WhisteNoiseReductionSystems_00
0.pdf#search='trainhornrules'

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0430wvquietzo
ne30.html

http://www.ci.slc.ut.us/council/agendas/2004agendas/2004reports/Septe
mber/0909VIII.pdf#search='fundingezone'

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/FromOldSite/pdforphan/nationwidestud
y.pdf#search='trainwhistleatnight'

http://www.herald-coaster.com/articles/2004/04/19/news/news05.txt

http://www.state.in.us/s12/2-4-03.htm

http://www.townofcary.org/depts/dsdept/P&Z/tcap/chapter8.pdf

http://trainweb.org/mdamtrak199/horns.html

http://www.metrowestfyi.com/story_display.php?sid=1940

http://www.bytrain.org/safety/hornrule.html

http://www.nonoise.org/quietnet/horn/home1.htm

http://www.metrowestfyi.com/story_display.php?sid=1940

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/noiseoff/

http://www.mayocommunications.com/PR77%20Placentia%20Quiet%20zone%
2011-21-02.htm

http://carolinareporter.sc.edu/archive02-26-03/26trains/26trains.html

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/ohiorail/Programs/Safety/Quiet%20Zone%
20Page.htm

http://www.hmmh.com/rail_horn.html

http://www.railroadcontrols.com/ahs/

http://www.rrlah.net/index.php

http://www.shorewood-hills.org/bulletin/jacobsen_report.htm

http://www.quiet.org/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rochestersoundscapesociety/

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/10/02/news/sandiego/18_40_1410_1
_05.txt

http://www.railroadcontrols.com/qzs/Quiet%20Zone%20Presentation%
20Web%20Version_files/frame.htm

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/steam-whistles/

http://www.noiseabatementsociety.com/tcms/home

http://trainweb.org/mdamtrak199/horns/phorn.html

http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/traffic-noise/

http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/TrainHorns/

http://www.tc.gc.ca/tdc/summary/14100/14163.htm

http://www.uprr.com/newsinfo/horn.shtml

http://www.haltomcitycitizen.com/EDC_mtg_notes_3_17_05.htm

http://www.aar.org/

http://www.noiseoff.org/

Hello, I am a M.Sc. student and currently working on a
project about road traffic noise. I will make all the
calculations according to the NMPB-96 (XPS 31-133)

I have been searching internet for 4 days but I could
not find the English version of the document. Could
you please send it to me or inform me how can I find
it.
Thank you for your time and consideration.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Hello i need the English version of NMPB-96 method for calculation of
the road traffic noise. How can I find it? Thank you..

Puis je copîer "[traffic-noise - Bruit Routier] Envoi groupé n° 148"
dans http://groups.google.fr/group/alter-auto? pour faire connaître le
groupe ?

May I copy "[traffic-noise - Bruit Routier] Envoi groupé n° 148" in
http://groups.google.fr/group/alter-auto? to promote the group ?
>